<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" 	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Utility Run</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/</link>
	<description>A running blog by an unexpected runner. Includes reviews of running gadgets and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 07:10:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieron</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8462</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8462</guid>
		<description>Do you use the MotionBased website to record any of your runs? If so, do you have the problems I have? You mention that you can&#039;t afford 10 minutes to wait until your Garmin locks on to a satellite signal. I get completely frustrated by the amount of time taken to process running data.

The site frequently times out and I&#039;ve heard from their support desk that Garmin Connect (Motion Based successor from what I can understand) won&#039;t be available until late August / September. Unless, that is, you want to shell out for a new Forerunner 405! (Nothing like supporting your existing customer base, eh!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you use the MotionBased website to record any of your runs? If so, do you have the problems I have? You mention that you can&#8217;t afford 10 minutes to wait until your Garmin locks on to a satellite signal. I get completely frustrated by the amount of time taken to process running data.</p>
<p>The site frequently times out and I&#8217;ve heard from their support desk that Garmin Connect (Motion Based successor from what I can understand) won&#8217;t be available until late August / September. Unless, that is, you want to shell out for a new Forerunner 405! (Nothing like supporting your existing customer base, eh!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: warriorwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8449</link>
		<dc:creator>warriorwoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 08:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8449</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t tried it on a cross country route but the foot pods systems are usually thought to be more accurate on hilly terrain than gps which has a greater margin of error in the vertical plane than horizontal.

I personally wouldn&#039;t make my choice on the basis of accuracy. I&#039;m not reliant on a metre accurate distance reading, instead I would look for a watch that gives me the information I want both on the run and off it. For me that&#039;s the garmin but for others I imagine the minimal simplicity and ease of the Nike+ sportband will really appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t tried it on a cross country route but the foot pods systems are usually thought to be more accurate on hilly terrain than gps which has a greater margin of error in the vertical plane than horizontal.</p>
<p>I personally wouldn&#8217;t make my choice on the basis of accuracy. I&#8217;m not reliant on a metre accurate distance reading, instead I would look for a watch that gives me the information I want both on the run and off it. For me that&#8217;s the garmin but for others I imagine the minimal simplicity and ease of the Nike+ sportband will really appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TriGirl Thea</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8445</link>
		<dc:creator>TriGirl Thea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8445</guid>
		<description>Ooo I&#039;m tempted...its just sooooo much cheaper than a Garmin.

How does it cope on hills and/or cross country?  Is it still as accurate do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooo I&#8217;m tempted&#8230;its just sooooo much cheaper than a Garmin.</p>
<p>How does it cope on hills and/or cross country?  Is it still as accurate do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speed Racer</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8444</link>
		<dc:creator>Speed Racer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8444</guid>
		<description>&quot;In this day and age where I seem to be uploading my stats to about a million trillion different online logs, that sort of convenience is just impossible to resist.&quot;  My dear, for you to be entering stats into a million, trillion different web pages, first you would have to DO a workout to get some stats.  

I got into the Nike + vs. Garmin thing with a chick at work the other day.  She took her Nike onto the treadmill and it was like half a mile per hour off.  Then she sped up and it said that she slowed down.  I don&#039;t know, i don&#039;t trust it.  

My garmin&#039;s been getting better about picking up reception, but maybe that&#039;s just me.  Then again, we just got a new computer and I can&#039;t get it to work THERE at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In this day and age where I seem to be uploading my stats to about a million trillion different online logs, that sort of convenience is just impossible to resist.&#8221;  My dear, for you to be entering stats into a million, trillion different web pages, first you would have to DO a workout to get some stats.  </p>
<p>I got into the Nike + vs. Garmin thing with a chick at work the other day.  She took her Nike onto the treadmill and it was like half a mile per hour off.  Then she sped up and it said that she slowed down.  I don&#8217;t know, i don&#8217;t trust it.  </p>
<p>My garmin&#8217;s been getting better about picking up reception, but maybe that&#8217;s just me.  Then again, we just got a new computer and I can&#8217;t get it to work THERE at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8443</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8443</guid>
		<description>Huzzah. Switch on, press start - Run! That&#039;s what I love about running, the simplicity of it. Talking of this it would be simple to go running if I could walk, rather than stumble. The link doesn&#039;t work, it should be http://www.earthwoman.co.uk/. ATB, Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huzzah. Switch on, press start &#8211; Run! That&#8217;s what I love about running, the simplicity of it. Talking of this it would be simple to go running if I could walk, rather than stumble. The link doesn&#8217;t work, it should be <a href="http://www.earthwoman.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.earthwoman.co.uk/</a>. ATB, Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8442</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8442</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s my biggest, biggest, peeve about the Garmin.   Why can&#039;t it just start-up, inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s my biggest, biggest, peeve about the Garmin.   Why can&#8217;t it just start-up, inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/comment-page-1/#comment-8441</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.warriorwomen.co.uk/2008/04/28/utility-run/#comment-8441</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... I&#039;d almost managed to convince myself that I don&#039;t need a Nike+ as I already have a Garmin, but now you&#039;ve just made me want one even more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; I&#8217;d almost managed to convince myself that I don&#8217;t need a Nike+ as I already have a Garmin, but now you&#8217;ve just made me want one even more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

